Trust & Estate Litigation

Trust and estate disputes often arise during periods of grief, incapacity, or significant family conflict. A trustee may refuse to provide information. A caregiver may receive an unexpected inheritance. A relative may claim that a new will or trust replaced a longstanding estate plan. Estate property may disappear. A fiduciary may favor one beneficiary, conceal transactions, delay distributions, or use inherited assets for personal benefit. These disputes involve more than money. They may concern a family home, a closely held business, sentimental property, a parent’s final wishes, or assets accumulated over a lifetime.

 

The Westmoreland Law Firm represents beneficiaries, heirs, trustees, executors, administrators, personal representatives, and other interested persons in contested trust and probate matters involving:

• Trust contests

• Will contests

• Undue influence

• Lack of capacity

• Fraud, forgery, duress, and coercion

• Breach of fiduciary duty

• Trustee removal or suspension

• Executor and administrator misconduct

• Trust and estate accountings

• Recovery of misappropriated property

• Financial elder abuse

• Beneficiary and inheritance disputes

• Trust interpretation

• Disputed amendments and restatements

• Creditor claims

• Real-property disputes

• Joint-account and beneficiary-designation disputes

• Conservatorship-related litigation

• Emergency injunctive relief

 

Trust and estate disputes are governed by specialized statutes, procedures, presumptions, evidentiary rules, and filing deadlines. Prompt investigation is often necessary to preserve assets, records, witness testimony, and legal rights.

​

WHAT IS TRUST AND ESTATE LITIGATION?

Trust and estate litigation involves disputes concerning the validity, interpretation, administration, ownership, or distribution of property under:

• Revocable living trusts

• Irrevocable trusts

• Wills

• Codicils

• Trust amendments

• Trust restatements

• Powers of attorney

• Beneficiary designations

• Joint accounts

• Transfer-on-death instruments

• Deeds

• Family business agreements

• Probate estates

• Conservatorships

• Other estate-planning or donative documents

 

A dispute may arise before or after a person dies. During life, litigation may concern incapacity, financial exploitation, misuse of a power of attorney, conservatorship, or improper amendment of an estate plan. After death, disputes may concern which document controls, who is entitled to inherit, whether a fiduciary acted properly, whether assets belong to a trust or estate, and whether property was wrongfully transferred.

​

TRUST CONTESTS

A trust contest challenges the validity of a trust, amendment, restatement, revocation, or particular provision. Potential grounds may include:

• Lack of mental capacity

• Undue influence

• Fraud

• Forgery

• Duress or menace

• Improper execution

• Mistake

• Invalid amendment

• Invalid revocation

• Financial elder abuse

• Disqualification of a beneficiary

• Lack of authority by the person signing

• Failure to comply with the trust’s amendment requirements

 

A contest may challenge an entire instrument or only the portion allegedly produced by misconduct. For example, a beneficiary may challenge a late amendment that unexpectedly removes the settlor’s children and transfers the estate to a caregiver, adviser, new companion, or recently involved relative. The existence of an earlier valid trust does not automatically establish that every later amendment is invalid. Each document and the circumstances surrounding its preparation and execution must be examined.

​

WILL CONTESTS

A will contest challenges whether a will or codicil should be admitted to probate or remain valid after admission. Potential grounds may include:

• Lack of testamentary capacity

• Undue influence

• Fraud

• Forgery

• Duress

• Improper execution

• Lack of testamentary intent

• Mistake

• Revocation

• Existence of a later valid will

• Disqualification of a beneficiary

 

The party offering the will generally must establish proper execution. A contestant generally bears the burden of proving grounds such as incapacity, undue influence, fraud, duress, mistake, or revocation. Will contests are subject to strict procedural deadlines. A person who receives notice of a probate petition should not assume that objections can be raised at any time.

​

UNDUE INFLUENCE

Undue influence may occur when excessive persuasion overcomes a person’s free will and causes a transfer or estate plan that reflects the influencer’s wishes rather than the transferor’s independent intent. Relevant circumstances may include:

• The person’s age, illness, dependency, or cognitive impairment

• Isolation from family members or trusted advisers

• Dependence on the alleged influencer for care, transportation, housing, medication, or finances

• Control over access to the person

• Participation in selecting or communicating with the drafting attorney

• Secrecy surrounding the new document

• A sudden and unexplained change from a longstanding estate plan

• A transfer inconsistent with prior statements or family relationships

• The influencer’s presence during meetings or execution

• Control over the person’s communications

• Threats, pressure, manipulation, or emotional coercion

• Use of false statements about other family members

• A result that substantially benefits the influencer

• Efforts to prevent independent advice

• Rapid execution during a medical crisis

• Removal of prior beneficiaries without a clear explanation

 

Undue influence does not require proof of physical force. It may result from a pattern of dependency, pressure, isolation, manipulation, or exploitation. A close relationship or unequal inheritance does not automatically prove undue influence. The entire factual context must be evaluated.

​

PRESUMPTIVELY IMPROPER TRANSFERS

California law creates special presumptions concerning certain donative transfers. Depending on the circumstances, a transfer may be presumed to result from fraud or undue influence when made to:

• The person who drafted the instrument

• Certain persons involved in transcribing the instrument

• Certain care custodians of dependent adults

• Certain persons related to or associated with the drafter

• Other persons identified by statute

 

Exceptions may apply based on family relationships, independent review, value transferred, or other statutory conditions.

These presumptions can affect the burden of proof, but they do not automatically resolve the dispute. The recipient may attempt to rebut the presumption with evidence that the transfer reflected the transferor’s free and informed decision.

 

LACK OF MENTAL CAPACITY

A trust, will, amendment, contract, deed, or other transaction may be challenged when the person lacked the legally required mental capacity at the relevant time. Capacity is not determined solely by:

• Age

• A diagnosis of dementia

• Alzheimer’s disease

• A conservatorship petition

• Physical disability

• Memory lapses

• Dependence on caregivers

 

The required level of capacity may differ depending on the document or transaction. Relevant evidence may include:

• Medical records

• Neurological evaluations

• Cognitive testing

• Medication history

• Hospital records

• Attorney notes

• Witness testimony

• Communications from the person

• Financial records

• Prior estate plans

• Video or audio recordings

• Evidence of confusion, delusions, or impaired judgment

• Evidence showing periods of lucidity

 

The central issue is generally the person’s mental functioning when the disputed document was signed or transaction occurred.

​​

FRAUD, FORGERY, AND DECEPTION

Estate litigation may involve allegations that a document or transfer resulted from fraud or was never validly authorized.

Potential misconduct may include:

• Forging a signature

• Substituting pages

• Altering a document after execution

• Misrepresenting the contents of a document

• Falsely telling the signer that the document served another purpose

• Concealing the existence of heirs or property

• Making false statements about family members

• Destroying or hiding an earlier will or trust

• Fabricating a beneficiary designation

• Using a false notary acknowledgment

• Creating documents after death

• Inducing a transfer through false promises

• Withholding material facts from the transferor

• Submitting false documents to a financial institution or court

 

Relevant evidence may include original documents, metadata, drafting files, notary journals, signature comparisons, email communications, medical records, witness testimony, and forensic document analysis.

​​

BREACH OF TRUST

A trustee must administer the trust according to the trust instrument and applicable law. A violation of a duty owed by the trustee to a beneficiary may constitute a breach of trust. Potential breaches include:

• Using trust property for personal benefit

• Engaging in self-dealing

• Favoring one beneficiary without authority

• Failing to preserve trust assets

• Making imprudent investments

• Failing to diversify when appropriate

• Selling property below fair value

• Purchasing trust property personally without proper authority

• Paying excessive trustee compensation

• Making unauthorized loans

• Commingling trust and personal funds

• Failing to collect money owed to the trust

• Failing to insure or maintain property

• Failing to enforce valid claims

• Concealing transactions

• Failing to provide required information

• Refusing to distribute assets

• Making premature or unauthorized distributions

• Incurring unnecessary expenses

• Using trust funds to defend personal misconduct

• Delegating responsibilities without proper oversight

 

A trustee’s good intentions do not necessarily excuse conduct that violates the trust or applicable fiduciary duties.

At the same time, a trustee is not automatically liable merely because an investment declined, a beneficiary disagrees with a decision, or administration takes longer than expected. The trustee’s authority, conduct, information available at the time, and governing documents must be evaluated.

 

TRUSTEE’S FIDUCIARY DUTIES

Depending on the trust and circumstances, a trustee’s duties may include:

• Administering the trust according to its terms

• Acting solely in the interests of the beneficiaries

• Avoiding conflicts of interest

• Avoiding self-dealing

• Treating beneficiaries impartially when required

• Preserving and protecting trust property

• Investing and managing assets prudently

• Keeping trust property separate

• Maintaining adequate records

• Providing required information

• Preparing proper accountings

• Enforcing and defending trust claims

• Making timely distributions

• Controlling expenses

• Complying with tax and reporting obligations

 

The trust document may grant discretion, but discretion is not unlimited. A trustee generally must exercise discretionary authority reasonably, in good faith, and for proper trust purposes.

​​

TRUST ACCOUNTINGS

Beneficiaries may be entitled to information concerning trust assets and administration. A proper trust accounting may include:

• Property on hand at the beginning of the accounting period

• Receipts

• Income

• Gains and losses

• Disbursements

• Trustee compensation

• Attorney and professional fees

• Distributions

• Liabilities

• Property remaining at the end of the accounting period

• Transactions involving related parties

• Changes in asset value

 

Warning signs of an inadequate accounting may include:

• Missing bank statements

• Unexplained withdrawals

• Large cash transactions

• Transfers to the trustee

• Missing rental income

• Unsupported professional fees

• Property sold without valuation information

• Inconsistent account balances

• Unexplained loans

• Payments to relatives or affiliated businesses

• Failure to identify assets

• Refusal to provide supporting documents

 

A beneficiary may petition the court to compel an accounting, object to an accounting, seek supporting records, or request relief based on improper transactions.​

 

REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION OF A TRUSTEE

A court may remove or suspend a trustee when legally sufficient grounds exist. Potential grounds may include:

• Breach of trust

• Insolvency

• Unfitness to administer the trust

• Hostility that materially impairs administration

• Failure to act

• Failure to provide information

• Failure to account

• Serious conflicts of interest

• Misappropriation of property

• Refusal to follow court orders

• Inability to administer the trust effectively

• Other good cause

 

Removal is not automatic whenever beneficiaries dislike or distrust the trustee. Courts generally consider the trust’s terms, the settlor’s selection, the nature of the alleged misconduct, the effect on administration, and the availability of less drastic remedies. When immediate harm is threatened, a party may seek temporary suspension, appointment of a temporary trustee, restrictions on transactions, or other protective relief.

​​

REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF TRUST

Depending on the circumstances, a court may:

• Compel the trustee to perform required duties

• Stop a threatened breach

• Order the trustee to repay money

• Restore lost trust property

• Recover profits obtained through misconduct

• Impose interest

• Remove or suspend the trustee

• Appoint a temporary trustee or receiver

• Reduce or deny trustee compensation

• Set aside improper transactions

• Impose an equitable lien

• Impose a constructive trust

• Trace and recover wrongfully transferred property

• Order an accounting

• Issue injunctive relief

• Award fees or costs when authorized

 

A trustee who breaches the trust may be charged with losses caused by the breach, profits obtained through the breach, or profits the trust would have earned but for the misconduct.​

 

EXECUTOR AND ADMINISTRATOR MISCONDUCT

The personal representative of a probate estate may be an executor named in a will or an administrator appointed when there is no controlling will or nominated executor able to serve. A personal representative may breach fiduciary duties by:

• Failing to identify estate assets

• Taking estate property

• Commingling funds

• Selling property for less than fair value

• Favoring one heir

• Paying improper claims

• Failing to address valid creditor claims

• Making unauthorized distributions

• Failing to preserve property

• Failing to maintain insurance

• Delaying administration without justification

• Failing to file required inventories or accountings

• Paying excessive fees

• Using estate assets for personal benefit

• Failing to collect money owed to the estate

• Concealing transactions

• Refusing to comply with court orders

 

A personal representative may be held responsible for loss or depreciation caused by a breach, profits personally obtained, or profits the estate would have received but for the misconduct.

​​

RECOVERY OF WRONGFULLY TAKEN PROPERTY

Trust and probate litigation may be used to recover property that belongs to:

• A trust

• A decedent’s estate

• A conservatee

• An elder or dependent adult

• A beneficiary

• Another person claiming ownership

 

Disputed property may include:

• Real estate

• Bank accounts

• Investment accounts

• Business interests

• Vehicles

• Jewelry

• Artwork

• Digital assets

• Insurance proceeds

• Retirement benefits

• Personal property

• Loan proceeds

• Property transferred by deed

• Property held in joint title

 

A court may determine ownership, order return of property, impose a constructive trust, trace proceeds, or grant other appropriate relief. When a person acts in bad faith by wrongfully taking, concealing, or disposing of qualifying property, enhanced statutory recovery may be available. Such relief depends on the particular findings and statutory requirements.

 

FINANCIAL ELDER ABUSE IN TRUST AND ESTATE DISPUTES

Financial elder abuse may overlap with trust and estate litigation when someone wrongfully takes, retains, transfers, conceals, or assists in taking an elder’s property. Potential misconduct may include:

• Misuse of a power of attorney

• Unauthorized withdrawals

• Transfers into joint accounts

• Changes to deeds

• Coerced gifts

• Unexplained loans

• Changes to beneficiary designations

• Transfers to caregivers

• Isolation combined with financial control

• Using the elder’s funds for another person’s expenses

• Pressuring the elder to amend a trust

• Obtaining property through undue influence

• Concealing transactions from family members

• Misusing conservatorship or trust authority

 

Potential remedies may include recovery of property, damages, attorney’s fees, statutory enhanced recovery, disqualification from inheritance, removal from fiduciary office, and other relief when the required elements are established.

​​

DISQUALIFICATION FROM INHERITANCE

A person may be barred from receiving certain benefits from an estate or trust when legally disqualifying misconduct is established. Potential grounds may involve:

• Intentionally and feloniously causing the decedent’s death

• Certain forms of elder or dependent-adult abuse

• Bad-faith financial exploitation

• Fraud or undue influence under applicable statutes

• Disqualification of the drafter or certain prohibited transferees

• Disclaimer or valid waiver

• Failure to survive for a required period

• Other statutory grounds

 

Disqualification is governed by specific statutory requirements. Misconduct that is morally objectionable does not automatically result in forfeiture unless the legal requirements are satisfied.

​​

TRUST INTERPRETATION DISPUTES

Even when a trust is valid, beneficiaries and trustees may disagree about what it means. Disputes may involve:

• Ambiguous language

• Conflicting amendments

• Inconsistent beneficiary provisions

• Identification of beneficiaries

• Distribution standards

• Trustee discretion

• Allocation of expenses

• Division of real property

• Rights to income and principal

• Conditions on inheritance

• Rights of surviving spouses

• Treatment of adopted or omitted children

• Business succession

• Powers of appointment

• Tax provisions

• Whether an asset belongs to the trust

 

A court may interpret the instrument, determine the settlor’s intent, resolve ambiguity, confirm trustee powers, or instruct the trustee concerning administration.

Extrinsic evidence may be considered in appropriate circumstances.

​​

OMITTED SPOUSE AND OMITTED CHILD CLAIMS

A spouse or child omitted from a will or trust may have statutory rights depending on:

• When the instrument was executed

• When the marriage occurred

• When the child was born or adopted

• Whether the omission was intentional

• Whether property was provided outside the instrument

• Whether a waiver exists

• The language of the estate plan

• The nature of the decedent’s property

 

An omitted family member does not automatically inherit. The governing instruments, dates, family relationships, and statutory exceptions must be examined.​

 

SPOUSAL PROPERTY DISPUTES

A surviving spouse may assert rights involving:

• Community property

• Quasi-community property

• Separate property

• Transmutation agreements

• Premarital or postmarital agreements

• Jointly titled property

• Reimbursement claims

• Omitted-spouse rights

• Retirement benefits

• Life-insurance proceeds

• Family businesses

• Property transferred before death

 

Title alone may not resolve whether property is community, separate, or partly both. These disputes may require tracing, financial records, agreements, deeds, tax records, and evidence concerning the source and use of funds.

​​

JOINT ACCOUNTS AND BENEFICIARY DESIGNATIONS

Assets may pass outside probate through:

• Joint tenancy

• Payable-on-death accounts

• Transfer-on-death accounts

• Life-insurance designations

• Retirement-account designations

• Transfer-on-death deeds

• Contractual beneficiary provisions

 

Disputes may concern:

• Whether the designation was valid

• Whether the account was created only for convenience

• Lack of capacity

• Undue influence

• Fraud or forgery

• Ownership of contributed funds

• Whether the beneficiary predeceased the owner

• Whether the designation was revoked

• Conflicting marital or contractual rights

• Improper changes shortly before death

 

A beneficiary designation is not necessarily immune from challenge merely because it operates outside probate.

​

REAL-PROPERTY DISPUTES

Trust and estate litigation frequently involves real property. Potential disputes include:

• Whether a residence belongs to the trust

• Improper deed transfers

• Forged deeds

• Undue-influence transfers

• Disputes among co-owners

• A beneficiary refusing to leave the property

• Failure to collect rent

• Sale below fair market value

• Failure to maintain or insure property

• Partition

• Claims for reimbursement

• Disputed life estates

• Conflicting occupancy rights

• Property promised to more than one person

• Trustee refusal to sell or distribute property

 

Real-property disputes may require immediate action to prevent foreclosure, waste, transfer, encumbrance, or loss of insurance.​

​

FAMILY BUSINESS AND PARTNERSHIP DISPUTES

An estate plan may include ownership in:

• Corporations

• Limited liability companies

• Partnerships

• Professional practices

• Family businesses

• Investment entities

• Intellectual property

• Commercial real estate

 

Disputes may concern:

• Ownership percentages

• Voting control

• Management rights

• Buy-sell agreements

• Valuation

• Transfers made before death

• Unauthorized distributions

• Compensation

• Succession rights

• Fiduciary duties

• Business records

• Whether an interest belongs to the trust or estate

• Whether a fiduciary is operating the business for personal benefit

 

These cases may involve overlapping probate, trust, corporate, partnership, contract, and tax issues.

​

NO-CONTEST CLAUSES

A no-contest clause attempts to penalize a beneficiary who challenges an estate-planning instrument or takes specified action. California does not enforce every no-contest clause against every type of claim.

 

Under current law, enforcement is generally limited to specified categories, including certain direct contests brought without probable cause and other disputes expressly covered by the clause and statute.

 

A direct contest may include challenges based on:

• Forgery

• Improper execution

• Lack of capacity

• Undue influence

• Fraud

• Duress

• Revocation

• Certain beneficiary-disqualification provisions

 

A beneficiary should not assume that filing any petition automatically causes forfeiture. Nor should a beneficiary assume that a no-contest clause can be ignored. The language of the clause, type of claim, protected instrument, available evidence, and existence of probable cause should be evaluated before litigation begins.

​​

CREDITOR CLAIMS AGAINST AN ESTATE

A person or business owed money by a deceased person may need to follow California’s probate creditor-claim procedures. Potential claims may involve:

• Loans

• Contracts

• Unpaid services

• Property damage

• Personal injury

• Business obligations

• Reimbursement

• Promissory notes

• Judgments

• Litigation pending at death

 

Special deadlines and claim-presentation requirements apply. Filing a civil lawsuit alone may not always satisfy probate claim requirements. A personal representative may allow or reject a claim. A creditor whose claim is rejected may need to file suit within a separate statutory period.​

 

TRUSTEE OR BENEFICIARY DEFENSE

Not every allegation against a trustee, executor, administrator, or beneficiary is valid. Potential defenses may include:

• The action was authorized by the governing instrument

• The trustee acted reasonably and in good faith

• The claimant consented after full disclosure

• The claimant released the fiduciary

• The transaction was fair and properly approved

• The claim is barred by a statutory deadline

• The trustee reasonably relied on professionals

• The alleged asset does not belong to the trust or estate

• The fiduciary maintained adequate records

• The distribution was required by the instrument

• The contestant lacks standing

• The challenged document was validly executed

• The transferor had capacity

• The transfer reflected independent intent

• No undue influence occurred

• The alleged damages are speculative

• The claimant accepted benefits inconsistent with the challenge

• A no-contest clause applies

• The action is barred by prior court orders or approved accountings

 

Fiduciaries should preserve records, avoid informal self-help, and obtain legal guidance before making disputed distributions or responding to accusations.

​

EMERGENCY RELIEF

Immediate court intervention may be necessary when property is at risk. Emergency relief may be sought to:

• Prevent the sale of real property

• Stop transfers from financial accounts

• Suspend a trustee

• Appoint a temporary trustee

• Freeze or restrict assets

• Prevent destruction of records

• Prevent dissipation of estate property

• Stop foreclosure

• Recover possession of property

• Enjoin self-dealing

• Preserve business operations

• Prevent eviction of a vulnerable person

• Protect an elder from exploitation

 

Emergency relief requires competent evidence showing why immediate action is necessary. Delay may weaken the request or permit the disputed property to be transferred, spent, or concealed.​

 

WHAT EVIDENCE SHOULD BE PRESERVED?

Relevant evidence may include:

• Original wills and trusts

• Amendments and restatements

• Powers of attorney

• Deeds

• Beneficiary designations

• Prior estate plans

• Drafting-attorney files

• Medical records

• Capacity evaluations

• Bank statements

• Investment records

• Tax returns

• Property records

• Appraisals

• Loan documents

• Business records

• Trustee accountings

• Receipts and invoices

• Emails and text messages

• Letters

• Voicemails

• Photographs and videos

• Calendars

• Caregiver records

• Notary journals

• Witness information

• Records showing isolation or dependency

• Communications concerning the estate plan

• Electronic files and metadata

• Evidence of the decedent’s prior intentions

 

Original documents should not be written on, altered, restapled, or rearranged unnecessarily. Electronic evidence should be preserved in its original form whenever possible.

​​

HOW LONG DOES A PERSON HAVE TO ACT?

Trust and estate disputes are governed by strict and sometimes unusually short deadlines. The deadline may depend on:

• Whether the dispute concerns a will or trust

• Whether a trust became irrevocable

• Whether statutory notice was served

• Whether an accounting was provided

• Whether the claimant received a trustee’s report

• Whether a will was admitted to probate

• Whether a creditor claim was allowed or rejected

• Whether the disputed act was concealed

• When the claimant discovered the misconduct

• The type of property or claim

• Whether financial elder abuse is alleged

• Whether the claimant is a minor or lacks capacity

• Whether another proceeding is pending

 

A trustee’s report may trigger a shortened period for certain breach-of-trust claims when it adequately discloses the existence of the claim. A notice concerning an irrevocable trust may also trigger a shortened period to contest the trust.

Waiting for the fiduciary to voluntarily provide records or resolve the dispute does not necessarily extend a statutory deadline.

​​

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Can I challenge a trust because the distribution is unfair?

An unequal or disappointing distribution does not by itself invalidate a trust. A contest generally requires a recognized legal basis, such as undue influence, lack of capacity, fraud, forgery, duress, improper execution, or invalid amendment.

 

Does dementia automatically invalidate a will or trust?

No. A diagnosis may be important evidence, but capacity is generally evaluated at the time the document was executed and under the legal standard applicable to that document.

 

Can a caregiver inherit from the person receiving care?

Potentially, but certain transfers to care custodians may be subject to a statutory presumption of fraud or undue influence. Family relationships, independent review, timing, and statutory exceptions may affect the analysis.

 

Can a trustee use trust money to hire an attorney?

A trustee may generally use trust assets for legal services reasonably related to proper trust administration. A court may deny reimbursement or surcharge the trustee when trust funds were improperly used to defend personal misconduct or pursue matters unrelated to the trust’s interests.

 

Can a beneficiary force a trustee to provide an accounting?

Potentially. The right to an accounting depends on the trust, the beneficiary’s status, prior reports, waivers, and applicable statutory requirements.

 

Can a trustee delay distributions?

A trustee may require reasonable time to identify assets, resolve debts, address taxes, value property, handle disputes, and complete administration. An unexplained or self-interested delay may support court intervention.

 

Can a trustee favor one beneficiary?

A trustee must follow the trust. When the trust grants discretion or creates different interests, unequal treatment may be authorized. When beneficiaries have comparable interests, unjustified favoritism may violate the duty of impartiality.

 

Can a trustee be removed?

Potentially. Removal may be ordered for breach of trust, unfitness, failure to act, serious conflict, hostility impairing administration, insolvency, or other statutory good cause.

 

Can I recover property taken before death?

Potentially. Claims may be brought to recover property wrongfully transferred or retained before death, including property obtained through fraud, undue influence, breach of fiduciary duty, or financial elder abuse.

 

Does a power of attorney allow an agent to give the principal’s property away?

Not automatically. The document must be reviewed carefully. An agent owes fiduciary obligations and may require express authority for gifts or estate-plan changes.

 

Can an executor sell estate property?

Potentially. The representative’s authority depends on the will, court orders, statutory authority, and whether administration proceeds under independent or supervised powers. The representative must still act consistently with fiduciary duties.

 

What if a beneficiary lives in the decedent’s house and refuses to leave?

The trustee or personal representative may have remedies to obtain possession, sell the property, charge for occupancy, or seek other relief. The governing instrument, ownership, prior agreements, and occupant’s rights must be evaluated.

 

Can a beneficiary object to trustee fees?

Yes. A beneficiary may challenge compensation that is excessive, unauthorized, inadequately documented, or connected to misconduct.

​

Can a beneficiary recover attorney’s fees?

Attorney’s fees are not automatically recoverable in every trust or probate dispute. Fees may be available under specific statutes, the trust instrument, equitable doctrines, surcharge principles, or findings concerning bad-faith account litigation.

​

Does a no-contest clause prevent every challenge?

No. California limits enforcement of no-contest clauses. The clause, proposed claim, protected instrument, and existence of probable cause must be analyzed.

​

Can a settlement resolve a trust dispute?

Yes. Trust and estate disputes may be resolved through negotiated agreements, mediation, property division, buyouts, fiduciary resignation, amended accountings, stipulated court orders, or other approved arrangements. Tax consequences, future administration, releases, and the interests of minors, unborn beneficiaries, or unascertained persons may require additional consideration.

​​

HOW THE WESTMORELAND LAW FIRM CAN HELP

Trust and estate litigation requires careful analysis of estate-planning documents, financial transactions, family history, fiduciary duties, medical evidence, and specialized probate procedures.

​

The Westmoreland Law Firm can:

• Evaluate trust and will contests

• Analyze undue influence and capacity issues

• Investigate suspected fraud or forgery

• Review prior estate plans and drafting history

• Obtain medical, financial, property, and business records

• Seek trust and estate accountings

• Challenge improper fiduciary transactions

• Defend trustees and personal representatives

• Seek removal or suspension of fiduciaries

• Recover wrongfully transferred property

• Trace trust and estate assets

• Pursue financial elder-abuse claims

• Address real-property and occupancy disputes

• Analyze joint accounts and beneficiary designations

• Interpret ambiguous trust provisions

• Evaluate no-contest clauses

• Present or defend creditor claims

• Seek emergency injunctive relief

• Coordinate forensic accounting, valuation, capacity, handwriting, and other expert analysis

• Negotiate trust and estate settlements

• Represent clients in mediation, evidentiary hearings, and trial

 

Our approach focuses on protecting the client’s legal rights while identifying practical solutions for preserving assets, resolving administration, and reducing unnecessary damage to the estate or trust.

 

 

This page provides general information concerning California law and is not legal advice. Reading this page does not create an attorney-client relationship. Standing, fiduciary duties, presumptions, remedies, no-contest provisions, filing deadlines, and rights to trust or estate property depend on the governing instruments and specific facts of each matter.